When feminism erupts, the "fatherless household" is seen as the "good guy" that solves the problem of men in this world.
I have news for you. Good and bad news. Patriarchy is not the "bad guy."
(The bad news) There are "motherless households" among us.
Fathers who raise their children without the mother's presence. No natural or a new "step mom" available to the children! Some men simply do not find a new "decent" woman to raise their children.
Yes, it is "easier" for a man to find a new-wife than it is for a mother with 5 children to find a "new man." But in reality, the "fatherless" household is going to be a weaker household, than a motherless household.
However, like all cases whether a mother or a father raises the children, if the father is "corrupt" and will not attend to the children's basic needs or the mother is "corrupt" and simply won't even pray with her children but send them to the babysitters and neglect them day after day, then there needs to be -DIVINE- intervention so to speak. Perhaps in cases where there is "infidelity," a person understands that there is a problem in the father, which it isn't in being a "man of the house" that is the problem, it is in obscenity that is the problem. Essentially a man that raises 4+ children is not a "bad man." (The good news). A man that has "obscenity" issues is a "bad man." Some of these men still didn't "grasp" the gospel message. They NEED the GOSPEL.
The father of the household could have a minority heritage of some sort, so taking away the children from the minority father is just as traumatic as anything. The guardian father could be a grandpa of the children or an uncle or some other relative. Maybe he is a single parent.
Anyhow, to add to the value, a mother and a few godly friends helps build the household. That is about all we can say for the conditions of our world.
*******
Essentially the bad guy is -Obscenity- when it comes to "woman's rights." It is NOT -Patriarchy- or a household with a father in it.
No comments:
Post a Comment