Many people claim that vaccinations are a way to prevent unnecessary death or life-long disabling diseases. But is that really true? The human body is designed to fight off infections. The more stable the body happens to be through good nutrition and exercise, the less likely it will succumb to nasty diseases. Furthermore, the more positive and encouraging words are shared in the body, through faith, the more likely the body can overcome the diseases.
In the era where immigrants started arriving on the shores of America, many people mistakenly believe the Native Americans died of small pox because they simply were not immune to the disease. The reality is that the blankets used by the sick patients were purposefully given and laid around in areas near the tribes, which created diseases among the native Americans. So they were FORCED to endure diseases instead of being allowed to naturally overcome them. The pressure from the immigration caused the diseases to spread more rapidly. Notably, the presidents of the United States, who were 100% white did NOT receive vaccinations. Yet they lived to a normal old-age in the 70's and 80's. So there was more of a nurturing environment that built up their immunity, than a vaccination issue that caused these presidents to survive to that particular age.
All in all, the simple diseases in the body are easily overcome by basic immunity. Flu, chickenpox and even measles are NOT life threatening or disabling diseases in most people with good health and strength. There is no reason to constantly ask a professional healthcare worker or system to jab a young child with ridiculously high amounts of toxins. In fact, when a medical student studies in medical school, or even nursing school, he or she ONLY sees about 4-5 pages out of thousands of pages of health care procedures and information, so WHY are people putting more trust into a vaccine that doesn't do anything, but damage the person. If the doctor spent under .001% of the time discussing vaccines, then the check-up should ALSO only cover vaccinations .001% of the time.
What about well-child-checks. Now for a child who is under the age of 6 weeks and the child was born healthy, you may believe that it is necessary to go to every well-child-check, because the doctor will tell the mother and father how to keep that child healthy. The reality, is that the normal functioning adult KNOWS what to do for the young child in a biological way. Perhaps culture has taught these things to the parent, so why does the young baby need to go see a stranger in a strangers office to expose the young baby to diseases that are around that office? I don't know, but if the child is normally functioning, gaining weight, and doesn't need to struggle in his or her survival, I see no reason that the simple well-child-check is necessary. A person simply needs to get out a basic chart on height, weight and functioning to determine if the newborn is growing appropriately. Furthermore, the well-child-checks are ways to get the parents to succumb to vaccination schedules in the first place!
As you can see, the professional services are not always necessary for raising a young baby. Parents are only pressured to use the professional services by incentive of governments and family. But if the parent can do his or her OWN sort of well-child-check on their own child, then the need for such services from a professional medical person is drastically reduced. Of course, there are exceptions for the unhealthy children, but there again, there should be little to no need to see a vaccination schedule on such a young fragile body.
No comments:
Post a Comment