The issues of WW2 were about
**Hatred of JEWISH/ISRAEL foundational elements first. FAMILY TREE conditions and INHERITANCE. --> signs of LEVANT features were rejected.
**REJECTION of TORAH SCROLL accounts (outlandish "judgments" on topics of discussion by and for Jewish people and history elements....ie. Talmudic, bible study elements of reality, culture elements)
**REJECTION of "Queen Esther" foundational elements (women features, and bride conditions). No mercy given to "woman's health" conditions which often do occur.
**purposefully ENSLAVING the people under the NAZI's watching eyes.
**purposefully rejecting THE ARTS of specific themes by JEWISH/ISRAEL foundational elements.
**purposefully REJECTING people who do not have the 100% white feature trait (even of JEWISH people who are more WHITE looking)
**Worship of a literal HATEFILLED man, BY 100% white people.
**Rejection of the "weak people" and "outcast people" mentioned in SERMON on the MT, and Parables.
It was not about:
**sexual impurity promotions or topical themes of sexualized conditions among people. Topics of eliminating the LGBT+ was at top priority? No, it was the JEWISH people who DISCUSSED sexuality themes, that was the FIRST thing, the sexuality topics were SECONDARY. Nazi's showed no mercy to SEXUALITY things.
**African American/BIPOC ancestry and history trails which promoted the removal of police
**trans-ideas where people can automatically change their ID given at conception. there ACTUALLY are multiple different Gender's among us? Are there REALLY? or did Jewish JESUS already discuss "the eunuch" and "heal the woman bleeding"...
**ALLLLLL Christian belief people caused WW2 especially those CHRISTIANS who were 100% white, were pro-life and had large(3+ children) family.
**ALL people who were built up with 100% white ancestry (non-Jewish) and practiced "same sex" love were eliminated. NO, there were pockets of 100% white people where they could still do "their own thing" because they were WHITE, despite "same sex love" or even LUST conditions in variations.
No comments:
Post a Comment