There are people here and there who claim that the Duggar's modesty is what created the "monster" in Josh Duggar. I wish such people would ACTUALLY read the bible....and see WHAT it actually says. If King Herod was around he would LAUGH at such nonsense. Jesus lived in Egypt for a while folks. Think about it. I've lived on this planet long enough to know some things about Levant.....males..... (they are just like God WANTED them to be in the beginning, and God continues to bring such male features to this planet through the womb of the woman)
It befuddles me that people actually think that way. Its like saying the "oven door" (which is referred to as the thing that keeps "hotness" under control) is what caused the fire. "Oven Doors" in and of themselves do NOT cause fires in homes! Just as an Oven Door serves a purpose, so does Modesty. A clear example of this is what happened to Israel in recent conflicts. There, the women on BOTH SIDES (Israel and Palestinian) territory were wearing Modest outfits. Clearly, it WAS NOT the modesty that creates the "hatred" brewing in men's hearts!
Even in the Pre-WW2 era women (on both sides) wore modest clothing! BUT it was HITLER who despised the "book of Esther"..... If a person actually READS the book of ESTHER....not only is it mentioning the "saving of Jewish people".....but it also mentions that ESTHER was a woman of "fine features."
Looking like Taylor Swift isn't always the bad-guy on the playing field....because YES, as the book of Esther describes.....she (queen Esther) had NATURALLY fine features. So Beauty isn't the "Bad guy"..... and neither is "modesty." If a person actually watches or listens to Kardashian conversations (they have ancestry from "Queen Ester" regions of the globe), one WILL find that they bicker and complain that so and so isn't "good looking enough" for some sort of photo shoot...... I mean like WOW....they are speaking DIRECTLY from the scripture and they don't even notice "it." Rachel or Leah? which one had more "fine features" in the bible? What about the stories about Sarah and Rebekah? There again, WHY did the husbands decide to do the things that they did with their wives?...... Hint: something to do with "fine features."
Speaking of fine-features in WW2 era.....if a woman was Jewish....she was treated DIFFERENTLY than "the others" in the crowd. Just sayin. Celeb status or otherwise style of features that exist on this planet DO affect behaviours and interactions in social ways. (Megan Markle and Tori Kelly have a few things to say to the dummies on this planet in regards to race....just as Queen Esther did too ..... yo)
Ok.
Do you get the point? Modesty and Fine-Features are not the bad-guy..... I know VARIOUS MUSLIM style dressed women on this playing field of this life on this earth through my FACEBOOK friends. THEY are not bad because they are modestly dressed like that. THEY have the ABILITY to stand strong despite the ignorance of the masses that surround them! PRAISE the GOOD LORD for standing in the middle of the BATTLE FIELD!
Now on to the "pro-life" issues in the Duggar family. Having 5+ children is NOT for everyone. NOT every mother and father can PHYSICALLY handle that. Cancer comes upon some households. Car-Accidents come across some households. "Child-hood trauma" comes across some households (mental disturbances which affect social things). "Racial-social trauma" comes across some households and so forth. Economic interests are besides the point, unless dignified reality sets in place (basically, many households COULD function IF they want to function under LOWER INCOMES). YES, it is possible to raise your hand in NEGLECT of INTEREST towards woman's REAL health. That means that UNNATURAL themes surrounding childbearing would be rejected. Mayim Bialik proclaims that "the birth control pill" and "unnatural methods" of dealing with that sort of interest in restrictions, ends up hurting the woman's rhythm in the long run, and leads to greater social problems as well as higher risk for variant forms of disease. Socially, pro-life women have BETTER outcomes in their social understanding and respect than pro-choice women. Essentially, depression and criminal-like-mockery behaviour is HIGHER in women who reject the "choose life" principle. One CAN and SHOULD notice these things in how "upset" certain "women" were when Ruth B. Ginsberg died, when the reality is that Ruth really wasn't in the "pro-choice" crowd FOR the practice of Abortion but BECAUSE they should practice abortions RARELY.....specifically "health related interests" in the mother of the child. I've noticed the "novice" behavior, in women who reject the idea or MOCK other households who have "Children" this or that way even in the "disguise" of being a "good" healthcare worker. Supposedly "free from racism" types of healthcare workers with "pro-choice" interests have a HARD TIME fully ACCEPTING that life begins at conception (photographs at 80+ years old person.....began AT conception...... biological mother and father were a role in the "celeb" appearance). No person on this planet exists without biological conditions. No excuse, dear "old adam."
As a side note, yes, NON-CHRISTIAN groups do practice pro-life things and VIOLENTLY so. Nigerian girls raped into Muslim world view, results in un-wanted....but OCCURANCE pregnancy and child-birth! There have been cases in certain Christian and even Jewish cults where extreme pro-life interests were at hand. Even slavery days had extremes in the bringing forth of children in a pregnancy that the women didn't "expect" but was FORCED upon her! Why the wicked continue to prosper in this world is beyond me. In reality, in areas where slavery or extreme Muslim things are not practiced.....TRAFFICKERS WANT.....to hide their baggage....hence pro-choice promotion. Think about it. Ensure that YOUR PUBLIC SCHOOL (even if you don't use those resources for your children) has a protection program in PLACE to protect the children under age 18.....especially the Teen crowd, because of "baggage" teachers and employees!
Basically, you get the point, the occurrence of EVIL in modest women and in pro-life interests are NOT related to the issues in which Josh Duggar committed his crimes. Muslims are non-Christian and non-pro-Israel. The issue is in the HEART of the matter. What was JOSH DUGGAR'S heart REALLY like? Ravi Zacharias? Same thing. Though his conditions were more in relationship to AGE and CONDITIONAL fame around the globe. In both cases, these men became SO FAMOUS, they lost the living word of HUMILITY and wanted to protect their own self-interest instead of confronting the evils with REALITY in the HEART of the matter. If the evils that occur towards the xyz religious group of people in China didn't occur......I would say that CHINA has the solutions to the modesty and pro-life interests (religiously related.....all the way back to ABE, ISAAC and JACOB). It doesn't....and big-brother China doesn't care....because big brother doesn't admit xyz occurrence in the bible and middle-east conditions. Think about it.
There is NOTHING tragic about being REAL folks. Yes, JESUS hung out with sinners. Did he join the CROWD and immediately say to the woman in Luke 7....."I agree with your sin and I want to join you in "it" ".....no.. ...... he just showed LOVE......GODLY interests at HEART.....or he WOULDN'T be GOD on the CROSS..... "celeb look alikes" existed back then too folks...... all those "statues" from history accounts.....and Pompeii would be worse than "sodom and gomorrah" too folks. Jesus said things CLEARLY....and history records continue FORWARD....not BACKWARD! Woman's womb still in operation as well as "the grave."
When the world falls in love with Sodom and Gomorrah.....we are left at ODDS with reality when it comes to the INTERESTS at heart in the home and family. Charlie is just an "average joe" before he was a celeb.......but I don't personally KNOW all the conditions in his "family tree"..... so....the fine features are here and there....so be it. or ELSE .... as JESUS said clearly..... "LUST......is the bad guy....just as if ADULTERY takes place".
No comments:
Post a Comment