Featured Post

Introduction

Welcome to the Raggedy Cottage and Garden. As an effort to promote home style creativity and genuine old-fashioned character, I have starte...

Thursday, March 11, 2021

Reverence to the WOMB of the WOMAN

 For the longest time "the people".....even "we the people" couldn't figure out "maternity conditions" based racism. .... Whom ever the family member may be.....it could very well be a person cognitive or not (dementia doesn't mean that the individual "forgets" how ancestry conditions work)


Just go back in bible history and there is Dinah of the bible.....Levi/Simeon watching in anger and destroying another tribe over *these things.*  FORCED conditions are not approachable to reality and safety of the woman (or man), basically.  SLAVERY involved MUCH forced conditions!  Lets not forget to reference out the idea that Margaret Sanger produces a DIFFERENT KIND of slavery (enhanced woman's bodies via abortion??creating the idea to purposefully abort children of a certain ethnicity background??)....but the SAME type of slavery at the same time (aka Sampson....and his womanizing conditions......Solomon had WAY toooooo many wives....J. Epstein reminded).  White-woman doesn't "get it" unless she is put into the shoes of those to whom she oppressed (I've learned this through working with 80+ year olds, long-term memory zones and remembering Pearl Harbour).


I've talked with so and so face to face, a woman who did Surrogate Parenting.....basically her womb was carrying another "mother and father" DNA trail......Would "racial issues" have played a role in the parents deciding whom to use as a "womb".......just something to think about.  Basically, giving reverence to ONE TYPE of womb (based on racial conditions) over another type of womb..... but YET woman's womb all function....... EQUALLY under the ORDERS of NATURE (meaning NO child in the womb has survived after only existing in that woman's womb under 20 weeks along).  All adults involved in the matter are "pro-life" in a general sense of understanding, or they wouldn't practice these surrogate things I assume.


The enemy since the time of Adam and Eve is against the "seed" of the woman. Gen_3:15  And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.


So its not the WOMB itself that the enemy wants to "destroy" its the IMAGE of the woman that the enemy wants to DESTORY, via the seed!


I see multiple different face features in cousins and so forth..... Pick a continent, any continent with human face features.  ALL faces were developed at 6 weeks in the womb or they wouldn't be here.


Celeb look-alike conditions even historical Anne Frank would fit in the mix of ancestry look-alike somewhere.


Even those children that PASSED away before they were out of the womb, breathing for one week or more out of the womb......who KNOWS what those children look like except the heavenly father who CREATED MAN (and angels) would know!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uOre5B_KbJU


Weddings? hmmm... .... no one really likes to go to a Zoom wedding.... so memories..... LONG TERM memories remain!





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Fky1vb-QqE





*****


Pick up a manual on the origins of the "Back Street Boys" their ancestry origins and a family tree reference to the order of things in the courts..... turns out in Genesis 6 "fair women" were approached (if they had their handsomeness then somewhere along the line there HAD to be a fair-woman or two or three).....so there ya go.  Created in his image began a LONG time ago.  But NOT so long ago that Darwinism reminds the "foolish people" that only the white people are the "survival of the fittest."  Darwin beliefs reference the "quality" of racial group over another........in recent history.  Humph.


***Back Street Boys are NOT 100% white on their "ancestry data" charts.....hence "sister/cousin" look alike contest to that of Megan Markle appearance.  Why do the "cousins" or the "grandpas" or the "grandmas" or the mother/father matter?  BECAUSE......ORAL STORY TELLING can tell the difference between RIGHT and WRONG on the family-tree morality chart.  Remember that Jesus and John the Baptist WERE cousins (paternal or maternal side....info not given).....Elizabeth was cousin to Mary and kept commandment.....but how distant were these cousins????***


In summary, ONLY the blood of the LAMB solves these issues.  If one is HAVING TROUBLE figuring out WHOM to trust (even in an empty relationship, an empty distant community and an empty womb).....just reference the ONE who created the HEAVENS in the beginning.  The orders of nature are designed WELL before you or I existed on this earth.  How many moons ago was the first Passover? (This is clearly defined via Farmer's Almanac timing even in a KJV bible)  The bible DOES reference "woman's monthly cycles" (goes with the moon phases)..... so GOD himself DOES know how the "woman's womb" works!  If HE knows how it works....then HE has the power to SHOW the people whom to TRUST in reverence for HIS KINGDOM purpose!   Remember that children/boys under age 2 were DROWN in the bible when wicked rulers were in POWER....so the reference to [ Gen_3:15  And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel. ] hasn't changed a whole lot.  Hey, it is TRUE that those who don't agree with Ray Comfort's 180' movie are actually trying to repeat WW2 history......merely by connecting the "dots" of look-like-anne-frank in the mother conditions (variations could be anything from any continent ancestry in the long run)!  What about miscarriages after 12 weeks?  What about rape?  What about incest?.......Ask the one who CREATED.....Margaret Sanger (wicked rulers in the bible whom murdered children post-womb existence) in the first place! (Ray-Comfort style!).  Car-accidents happen to children inutero and post-utero....even 120 years post-utero!

Note 2: the idea that ONLY white people commit these acts of Racial hatred of a child in the womb is NOT correct.  Passover conditions and things that led up to it BEGAN during the time of MOSES. At that time the children of Israel were in the "tabernacles of Ham" (The child 2 years old and under.....even within the womb....sent to sit in the sun instead of survive the elements).  There are MANY cases of genocidal behaviour in people groups on continents outside of Europe areas.  Even evidence of Racial hatred of minority towards a "majority" ancestry condition (aka a Native American tribal member who doesn't want to reference the future child who will have "white features")  These things are from the GARDEN in Genesis..... Gen_3:15  And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.

No comments:

Songs of Love and Hope