Featured Post

Introduction

Welcome to the Raggedy Cottage and Garden. As an effort to promote home style creativity and genuine old-fashioned character, I have starte...

Saturday, December 12, 2020

The conditions of FRAUD in USA voting systems existed WAY BEFORE the constitution writing

 There is a problem with FRAUD in the USA voting system?


YES Definitely.  


This problem existed WAY before the founding of the USA constitution my friend.


It is called "the deep state," but it is DEEPER still.  It is truly a PROBLEM in the heart.


What am I talking about?  


DId this problem of fraud suddenly show up because we now understand "racism" so much better post WW2?  No


Historical problems of racism have been around for centuries.  Do research on conditions of -Moses/ Hebrews in Egypt- -Moabites and other anti-semitic groups of the bible- -Queen Esther vs. Hamman- -Greeks vs. Jews in Maccabees- -Nero/Romans of 70 AD- -Constantine- -Spanish Inquisition- -Slavery in colonial era and actual Black people of Africa (Sudanese Jews, Ethiopian Jews etc)-  ALL of these things occurred WELL BEFORE the constitution and its writing.


Now look at it this way.  We now have so many EDUCATED individuals in our society.  And the GREATEST of the most Educated Attend/ Attended IVY LEAGUES..... so why now address that ANYONE with an IVy LEAGUE could possibly be WRONG about issues of FRAUD?


Answer: Sadducees.


I don't KNOW the full history of SADUCEES, but I can digest the REALITY that a. they were men filled with pride b. they were men who had a lot of knowledge about xyz c. they DID NOT believe in the resurrection.


The Sadducees are NEVER used as a means of "good" in the New Testament.  The Sadducees are NEVER converted in the New Testament.  When Jesus (Yeshua sure....don't get so technical about names please....its the story line friend read 1 Cor 13 and 1 John) addresses the Sadducees in Matt 22, they seem to be AWARE of the scripture, but they are USING the scripture as a WEAPON against belief in GOD!


What portion of scripture would that be referencing?


Deut 25


Read it to GAIN AWARENESS of this BRIGADE in action.


Read the book of Esther.  She married OUTSIDE of the Jewish people.  GOD (once again don't get technical with names.....seriously.  Yahway, Elohim... I know I know whom.....just as I know Robert.... I also know BOB....just as I know Moshe in hebrew I know MOSES in English....all he needs to say is I AM that I AM) is NOT mentioned in the Book of Esther, but we KNOW that HE saved the Jewish people.  We don't KNOW that Esther went on to have children, unless we do our research in Historical relevance.  We don't KNOW that Mordechai had a wife and/or children, unless we do our research in Historical relevance.  Certain information is NOT given......in the scripture for such a time as this.  Do we HAVE to get technical about the definition of "marriage" from Deut 25 and the book of Esther?  Divorce is defined by ACTION alone....so there is the definition of Marriage in context.....of BOTH situations.....BROTHERS are males.....woman/females can BEAR children.


Anyhow, the SADDUCEE "knows scripture," but he uses scripture as a TOOL to DENY the resurrection!  To DENY creation/the creator!   He loves his OWN PRIDE and AWARENESS of this and that under the sun.  But he doesn't ADMIT realities.  In fact, he KNOWS enough about realities to ignore, destroy and manipulate realities to have it HIS WAY.....even though HE didn't CREATE those realities from the BEGINNING (aka he didn't choose his OWN biological parents).


FAMILY LIFE.


Why raise up a name to a DEAD BROTHER?  In fraudulent votes, didn't they try to raise up a "vote" to a DEAD individual or to incompetent individuals?  A proper Sadducee in their intellectual capacity would ask the question from Deut 25......What if there were not ANY BROTHERS....and the family only consisted of One Brother and Many SISTERS.....surely there would BE NO NAME passed on.....  Hmmm.  Point made.  But missing the POINT of scripture itself.


The  point is that the BROTHER who marries/supposed to marry the WIDOWED woman (yes she is dependent on MALES in the Torah writings), doesn't WANT to take on the ROLE of family life AS it is written in the SCRIPTURE to do so and in PROPER context.  HIS HEART is NOT fixed on redemption for ISRAEL.  Mordechai.....didn't RAISE a child whom he "gave name to."  In other words, he did NOT bear the burden of "birth" of queen Esther. 


Ok.  So are you getting the "picture."  The name of the brother is essential because it bears the REALITY of WHOM is the woman's first husband.  Her FIRST husband (whom took her virginity in context).....Jewish by NAME and condition, the second husband REFUSING to name the ID of the first husband....or third....down the line brothers.  Basically they DON'T want to ID in proper CONTEXT of REALITY!


If a man doesn't WANT the proper ID to be known.......he doesn't WANT to KNOW the REDEEMER of man.  That is WHY Sadducees, though "gifted" in their intellectual capacity are NEVER used in a "good way" in the New Testament.


How did the King of King....the King of KINDNESS and REALITY in IDentity address them....as HE is the REDEEMER?


"Mat 22:29-33  Jesus answered and said unto them, Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God.  (30)  For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven.  (31)  But as touching the resurrection of the dead, have ye not read that which was spoken unto you by God, saying,  (32)  I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob? God is not the God of the dead, but of the living.  (33)  And when the multitude heard this, they were astonished at his doctrine."  THIS VERSE is the VERY REASON "intellectuals" are OBSESED with "redefining" marriage/sexuality issues (or other things of this sort at hand....he wasn't stealing that TV....he needed it to feed his family??)!  Think about it.  Did Mordechai commit "sexual impurity" with his or her cousin?  Or did they NOT notice that Esther was BIOLOGICALLY related to Mordechai in this particular way?  Jesus NEVER redefines Marriage....in a way that suits HIS ideas.... he ALWAYS points to the FATHER!



I am not SAYING that EITHER political party or Candidate was a GREAT choice in the matter.  This is impossible since BOTH have issues if we look at these men as JESUS would look at these men (sexual impurity with children, improper treatment/understanding of women, S & G isn't addressed as a bad-place by these men etc).  I am saying we would be BETTER to focus on what the SCRIPTURE says about these matters and GET IN LINE with reality (aka no two year old of ANY ancestry background can literally raise him/herself without a "basket" of burden from other people whom are older.....raising up THE NAME)  I AM saying that FRAUD in ANY political system WILL ruin people.  The burden is on the $$$$ and whom "creates it" in context (the government systems).  MAN cannot live on BREAd ALONE....but NEEEDS redemption principles to fully come to TERMS with the issues at hand.


*********************



The burden of scripture is a burden of "itself."  Because He alone bares the burden of OUR SIN.


Look at it like this.  Mariah Carey.  Sure she voted "liberal" in the election.  She hangs with Ellen DeGeneres on a video (Evidence Evidence Evidence..... I see the Evidence).  The video is THERE  it shows her LITTERALLY interacting, speaking on good terms with her.  Then there is Steven L. Anderson, a highly controversial heavy right-wing-leaning pastor.  If Mariah Carey is to the Sadducee as Steven L. Anderson (this sermon is actually useful about 1st john youtube) is to the Pharisee......BOTH are fairly GIFTED and INTELLECTUAL in some way or another.  Jesus said to BEWARE of BOTH of their types of FRUIT.  Even though Mariah has Black Ancestry and was talking with an LGBT person in cool terms......God will choose to use Steven L. Anderson, but he will NOT use Mariah.  GOD does NOT work the way MAN wants him to see things.  If MAN himself had the ability to "generate good"....then the woman caught in adultery would be told to "go back and sin some more".....but Jesus said properly.....GO AND SIN NO MORE.  Which later leads to Revelation 22.....Read it.  The believers....OBEY the COMMANDMENTS.


Now go and read how PAUL the FORMER Pharisee had to interact with the Sadducees and Pharisees....  NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER pleasant~~~~!!!~~~~!!!!












No comments:

Songs of Love and Hope